Commitment to vaccine prophylaxis of employees of a children's polyclinic
AbstractSome epidemiological studies have shown negative attitudes towards vaccinations among certain categories of health workers. This aspect is not studied in the case of the workers of the outpatient network directly involved in the organization and implementation of vaccination.
The study aims to analyze the attitude of staff members of the children’s clinic towards vaccination and propose measures to increase their competence and commitment to vaccinations.
Material and methods. An analytical epidemiological study was conducted using the online questionnaire published by Google. Participation was voluntary. Total 779 questionnaires received.
Results. The analysis of the results of the study showed that the attitude to vaccination of children’s health care workers varied according to position, length of service and specialty. Among doctors, 91.6% were positive to the vaccine, nurses – 80.6%, and non-medical staff – 65%. Among the trainees, the number of positive inoculations was higher than for staff with less than 10 years’ experience.
Conclusion. Modern IT technologies allow to quickly evaluate the attitude to vaccine prophylaxis of any population groups, including MP, which allows them to be used as «quick-reaction» technologies in the information subsystem of epidemiological surveillance for vaccine prophylaxis. The results confirm the need for continuous information support to health workers on the immunprophylaxis of infectious diseases throughout their work.
Keywords: vaccination; acceptability; pediatricians; adherence to vaccination
Funding. The study had no sponsor support.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Contribution. Concept and design – Minaeva V.A., Golubkova A.A., material collection and processing – Minaeva V.A., data processing – Minaeva V.A., text writing – Minaeva V.A., editing, approval of the final version of the article – Golubkova A.A., responbility for the integrity of all parts of the article – Minaeva V.A., Golubkova A.A.
For citation: Minaeva V.A., Golubkova A.A. Commitment to vaccine prophylaxis of employees of a children’s polyclinic. Infektsionnye bolezni: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training]. 2025; 14 (1): 64–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2305-3496-2025-14-1-64-73 (in Russian)
References
- Namazova-Baranova L.S., Briko N.I., Feldblum I.V., eds. Vaccines and immunoprophylaxis in the modern world: a guide for doctors. Moscow: Pediatr; 2021. 646 р. (in Russian)
- Tatochenko V.K., Ozeretskovsky N.A., Fedorov A.M. Immunoprophylaxis-2014. Moscow: Pediatr, 2014. (in Russian)
- Briko N.I., Feldblum I.V., Alyeva M.Kh, Mindlina A.Ya., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Baranov A.A., et al. The concept of risk-communication to ensure adherence to vaccine prophylaxis. Moscow: Pediatr; 2021. ISBN: 978-5-6045954-5-9. (in Russian)
- Marti M, de Cola M, MacDonald NE, Dumolard L, Duclos P. Assessments of global drivers of vaccine hesitancy in 2014-Looking beyond safety concerns. PloS One. 2017; 12 (3): e0172310.
- Golubkova A.A., Platonova T.A., Semenenko T.A., Smirnova S.S., Nikitskaya A.D., Chikunova M.V. Multilevel monitoring of vaccination adherence in different population groups in the COVID-19 pandemic: problematic issues. Epidemiology and Vaccine Prophylaxis. 2021; 20 (6): 28–36.
- Tatochenko V.K. Commentary on the article “Admission to educational organizations in case of refusal to vaccinate” prepared by the legal department of the “Faculty of Medical Law”. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii [Current Pediatrics]. 2020; 19 (5): 386–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v19i5.2215 (in Russian)
- Plakida A.V., Briko N.I., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Feldblum I.V., Los N.A., Ivanova E.S. Increasing population adherence to vaccination: evaluation and systematic approach to implementation. Epidemiology and Vaccine Prophylaxis. 2022; 21 (3): 4–26. (in Russian)
- Chan A.H.Y., Tao M., Marsh S., Petousis-Harris H. Vaccine decision making in New Zealand: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24 (1): 447.
- Islam M.S., Kamal A.H.M., Kabir A., Southern D.L., Khan S.H., Hasan S.M., et al. COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence. PloS One. 2021; 16 (5): e0251605.
- Krastev S., Krajden O., Vang Z.M., Juárez F.P.G., Solomonova E., Goldenberg M.J., et al. Institutional trust is a distinct construct related to vaccine hesitancy and refusal. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23 (1): 2481.
- Skafle I., Nordahl-Hansen A., Quintana D.S., Wynn R., Gabarron E. Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines on social media: rapid review. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24 (8): e37367.
- Sinuraya R.K., Nuwarda R.F., Postma M.J., Suwantika A.A. Vaccine hesitancy and equity: lessons learned from the past and how they affect the COVID-19 countermeasure in Indonesia. Global Health. 2024; 20 (1): 11.
- Romanenko V.V., Kosova A.A., Smirnova S.S., et al. Organization of the system of immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases in the Sverdlovsk region: textbook; under the general editorship of V.V. Romanenko. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Medical University, 2023: 172 p. (in Russian)
- Barry M.M., Sixsmith J., Infanti J.J. A literature review on effective risk communication for the prevention and control of communicable diseases in Europe. ECDC; 2013.